WTI crude slid 1.5% to $70.97 a barrel as renewed hopes for US-Iran negotiations outweighed fresh military strikes that had threatened supply through the Strait of Hormuz.
WTI crude slid 1.5% to $70.97 a barrel as renewed hopes for US-Iran negotiations outweighed fresh military strikes that had threatened supply through the Strait of Hormuz.

WTI crude slid 1.5% to $70.97 a barrel as renewed hopes for US-Iran negotiations outweighed fresh military strikes that had threatened supply through the Strait of Hormuz.
West Texas Intermediate crude fell to $70.97 a barrel in intraday trading Friday, reversing gains from earlier in the week when the benchmark had traded above $72 on concerns that tit-for-tat strikes could disrupt the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint for about a fifth of global oil consumption. The decline came as reports emerged that Iran's foreign minister held talks with regional leaders and mediators, raising expectations of a diplomatic breakthrough.
"The market is pricing a higher probability of de-escalation after reports of renewed diplomatic channels," said Omar Tariq, an energy analyst covering oil and commodities. "But the situation remains fluid — any breakdown in those talks could quickly reverse this move, and the Strait of Hormuz shipping disruption hasn't fully resolved."
Brent crude, the global benchmark, edged down to around $76 a barrel, extending a 2.2% decline from Thursday. The retreat followed Iran's retaliatory strikes on US military infrastructure in Gulf states Thursday after US forces struck targets in Iran's southern coastal and eastern provinces earlier this week. Shipping through the Strait of Hormuz has remained constrained, with vessels facing delays and higher insurance premiums, according to shipping data.
The price swing underscores how deeply oil markets remain tethered to geopolitical developments in the Middle East. Before the latest escalation, WTI had traded near $78 a barrel on July 8, according to data from the US Energy Information Administration. The current pullback reflects market hopes that diplomatic channels could prevent a broader conflict that would threaten sustained supply disruptions. The last major Hormuz disruption, following Iran's seizure of tankers in 2019, pushed Brent above $75 and added about $5 a barrel in risk premium over three months.
The drop in crude comes as traders also weigh demand-side pressures. Japan's producer price index rose 7.1% year-over-year in June, above the 6.8% forecast and accelerating from 6.6% the prior month, reinforcing concerns that sticky inflation could keep central banks on a tightening path. Markets are pricing a 63% probability of a Federal Reserve rate hike in September, up from about 54% a week earlier, according to CME's FedWatch tool. Higher interest rates tend to weigh on oil demand by slowing economic activity and strengthening the US dollar, which makes dollar-denominated crude more expensive for holders of other currencies.
For consumers, the retreat in crude prices could provide some relief at the pump. Crude oil typically represents more than half of each gallon's cost at the gas station, according to the US Energy Information Administration. A sustained decline in WTI would likely translate into lower gasoline prices in the weeks ahead, though the "rockets and feathers" phenomenon — where prices rise quickly but fall slowly — may delay the pass-through.
The next catalyst for oil markets will be the trajectory of US-Iran negotiations. If diplomatic channels yield a tangible ceasefire or de-escalation framework, WTI could test support near $68 a barrel, a level last seen in late June. Conversely, a breakdown in talks and renewed strikes on energy infrastructure could push prices back above $75, traders said. The US and Iran have a history of abortive negotiations — the 2015 nuclear deal collapsed in 2018 after the US withdrew, and President Trump's recent comment that the temporary peace deal with Iran was "over" suggests the path to a lasting resolution remains uncertain.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.