Apple is doubling its MacBook Neo production target to 10 million units, a move that forces it to pay a premium for TSMC's A18 Pro chips and accelerates its push to diversify its supply chain with Intel and Samsung.
Back
Apple is doubling its MacBook Neo production target to 10 million units, a move that forces it to pay a premium for TSMC's A18 Pro chips and accelerates its push to diversify its supply chain with Intel and Samsung.

Apple Inc. is aggressively ramping up production for its upcoming MacBook Neo, despite paying premium prices for TSMC's A18 Pro chips and scarce DRAM. The move signals intense confidence in its new hardware line and exposes the supply chain pressures forcing the company to explore US-based manufacturing with rivals Intel and Samsung.
"We have less flexibility in the supply chain than we normally would," Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook said on the company’s recent earnings call, noting that the availability of advanced nodes to produce its processors represents a significant constraint on growth.
According to reports, Apple has instructed suppliers to prepare for 10 million MacBook Neo units this year, a substantial increase from an initial target of five to six million. This surge in volume requires paying a premium to secure A18 Pro chips from a capacity-strained Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. and navigating higher costs for essential memory components, further inflating the device's bill of materials.
The production hike suggests Apple anticipates the MacBook Neo will be a major revenue driver, but the rising component costs threaten profit margins. More importantly, it highlights the strategic vulnerability of its decade-long reliance on a single foundry partner, a risk that is pushing Apple into exploratory discussions with Intel Corp. and Samsung Electronics Co. for future chip production.
For nearly a decade, Apple has enjoyed priority access to TSMC's most advanced process nodes, a partnership that has been central to the performance of the iPhone and Apple Silicon Macs. However, the recent boom in demand for AI accelerators, driven by companies like Nvidia, has consumed TSMC's leading-edge capacity. The Taiwanese foundry has stated it is scrambling to add more capacity, with shortages projected to last beyond 2027.
This industry-wide bottleneck means Apple is now competing for wafer allocation in a way it hasn't before, forcing it to pay premiums to secure the supply needed for its ambitious product launches. The situation is compounded by Washington's push for silicon sovereignty, which has reshaped Apple's long-term supply chain strategy to favor American-made hardware.
Faced with these headwinds, Apple is reportedly pursuing a two-pronged diversification strategy, holding preliminary talks with both Intel and Samsung. Both potential partners are making significant investments in US-based fabrication plants, which aligns with Apple's goal to mitigate geopolitical risk and curry favor with the US government.
Intel's 18A-P process, a performance-enhanced version of its 18A node, is a potential candidate for future Apple chips. Some reports suggest Apple's interest grew after reviewing early results from Intel's process development kits. For Samsung, the target would be its SF2 (2nm) node, which is scheduled for high-volume manufacturing in 2027 at its new facility in Taylor, Texas.
This diversification would likely see Apple offload production of its entry-level chips, such as the rumored A21 for the base iPhone 19, to Intel or Samsung. Doing so would free up TSMC's most advanced and constrained capacity for the high-margin "Pro" and "Max" silicon that powers its premium devices like the MacBook Neo. While pricing is a factor, a successful partnership with either foundry would grant Apple critical supply chain redundancy and significant leverage in future negotiations. For Intel or Samsung, winning even a fraction of Apple's massive 250-million-unit annual iPhone volume would be a monumental endorsement of their foundry ambitions, likely prompting other major designers like Qualcomm and MediaTek to follow suit.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.