What is the current price of Pepe (PEPE)?

What is the daily trading volume of Pepe (PEPE)?

What is the market cap of Pepe (PEPE)?

What is the circulating supply of Pepe (PEPE)?

What is the fully-diluted market cap (FDV) of Pepe (PEPE)?

Pepe (PEPE) Crypto Price, Chart, News and AI analysis

Sep 12 2025, 12:51

Whale Withdraws $15.95 Million PEPE from Kraken, Signals Market Volatility

A whale address withdrew 1.51 trillion PEPE tokens, valued at $15.95 million, from the Kraken exchange, signaling potential market volatility and shifts in supply dynamics. Executive Summary A prominent whale address executed a significant withdrawal of 1.51 trillion PEPE tokens, equivalent to $15.95 million, from the Kraken cryptocurrency exchange. This substantial on-chain movement is anticipated to introduce heightened speculation and price volatility within the PEPE market. The Event in Detail On-chain analyst Ai Yi identified a new address, 0x700...056a6, which initiated the withdrawal of 1.51 trillion PEPE tokens from Kraken. The transaction, occurring recently, valued the withdrawn tokens at $15.95 million, based on a withdrawal price of $0.00001051 per PEPE. Market Implications and Whale Behavior Large-scale whale movements, particularly withdrawals from centralized exchanges, carry significant market implications. While movements to cold storage are often interpreted as accumulation, potentially fostering bullish sentiment and reducing immediate selling pressure, transfers from exchanges can precede either long-term holding or over-the-counter (OTC) sales. Both scenarios directly influence the circulating supply and liquidity dynamics of PEPE. Historical whale activities illustrate varied impacts. For instance, a previous withdrawal of 500.6 billion PEPE (valued at $5.2 million) from Binance was noted to potentially reduce immediate selling pressure and contribute to short-term price stability or upward movement. In contrast, instances like a whale dumping 330 billion PEPE to Kraken led to immediate selling pressure and a price decline, sometimes resulting in a realized loss for the whale. Furthermore, the strategic rotation of assets by whales, such as divesting from PEPE to accumulate other tokens like ENA, can also exert selling pressure on PEPE, indicating shifts in broader market sentiment among large holders. Broader Context and Risk Management The current withdrawal by the 0x700...056a6 address introduces uncertainty into the PEPE market. Depending on the whale's subsequent actions—whether the tokens are moved off-exchange for long-term holding or prepared for large-scale sales—it could significantly alter PEPE's supply dynamics on exchanges. Market participants often perceive large transfers to centralized exchanges as potential sell-offs, which can trigger bearish sentiment and influence broader investor behavior. This emphasizes the importance of monitoring on-chain data for insights into liquidity and potential volatility shifts within the PEPE ecosystem.

Sep 10 2025, 15:10

Senate Democrats Propose Seven-Pillar Framework for US Crypto Regulation

A group of Senate Democrats introduced a seven-pillar framework for U.S. crypto market regulation, aiming to establish clear rules and consumer protections through bipartisan legislative efforts. Executive Summary Twelve Senate Democrats have released a comprehensive seven-pillar framework detailing their conditions for supporting a digital-asset market-structure bill in the United States. This initiative signals a willingness by the Democratic party to engage in bipartisan negotiations with Republicans to establish a durable regulatory framework for the nearly $4 trillion global crypto market. The proposal emphasizes investor protections, closing regulatory gaps, and curbing potential illicit finance activities, aiming to reduce future regulatory uncertainty and foster innovation. The Event in Detail The framework, introduced on Tuesday, outlines a detailed approach to regulating U.S. crypto markets. It proposes granting the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) new powers over spot markets for non-security tokens, while establishing a clear process to determine if a digital asset falls under the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)’s jurisdiction as a security. This aims to provide jurisdictional clarity for the sector. The framework also mandates disclosure requirements for token issuers and calls for crypto-specific rulemaking for exchanges and custody providers. Strict anti-manipulation and consumer protection standards are central to the proposal. Additionally, all digital asset platforms serving U.S. users would be required to register with FinCEN as financial institutions, subjecting them to Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), Anti-Money Laundering (AML) rules, and sanctions enforcement. Decentralized Finance (DeFi) is identified as a key vector for illicit finance, with the framework calling for new oversight tools to prevent its misuse. It also seeks to prohibit interest or yield paid by stablecoin issuers, whether directly or indirectly. A politically charged section targets ethics, barring elected officials and their families from launching or profiting from crypto projects while in office, and mandating disclosure of their digital asset holdings. The Democrats called for increased funding for financial regulators and a guarantee of bipartisan representation in their rulemaking processes. Market Implications The introduction of this framework could lead to more predictable regulation for the crypto industry in the U.S., potentially fostering innovation and institutional adoption. The bipartisan effort suggests a path towards regulatory clarity, which could mitigate the current state of market uncertainty. However, failure to reach a consensus between the Democratic and Republican proposals could prolong regulatory ambiguity, hindering further growth and investment within the Web3 ecosystem. Expert Commentary In their proposal, the senators stated: > "Digital asset technology has the potential to unlock new businesses and spur American innovation. But questions about digital assets place in the U.S. regulatory framework have hobbled both innovation and consumer protection." This sentiment underscores the legislative intent to address the regulatory void that has constrained both innovation and consumer safeguards. Regarding the ethics provisions, Democrats have alleged, as per their framework, that certain actions by elected officials have undermined confidence in the broader digital asset industry, emphasizing the need for robust ethics rules. Broader Context The Democrats’ framework sets the stage for negotiations with Republicans, who have also introduced their own market structure bill drafts. The bipartisan approach is deemed essential for any legislation to advance through Congress. The objective is to create "clear rules of the road that protect consumers and safeguard our markets" and to ensure that digital assets are not exploited for illicit activities or personal gain by public officials. The overarching goal is to define how cryptocurrencies fit into current or future regulatory frameworks, thereby solidifying the U.S. position in the evolving global digital asset landscape.

Sep 10 2025, 12:49

Indian Minister’s Crypto Disclosure Underscores Regulatory Stasis

Indian Union Minister Jayant Chaudhary's continued crypto investment disclosures highlight India's ongoing regulatory paralysis in digital assets, fostering uncertainty despite high domestic adoption and talent potential. Executive Summary Indian Union Minister Jayant Chaudhary has disclosed a 19% increase in his cryptocurrency investments, reaching $25,500. This marks the second consecutive year a cabinet member has revealed digital asset holdings, occurring amidst a persistent regulatory vacuum in India's digital asset sector. This regulatory inertia continues to undermine India's potential global leadership in the digital asset space, creating an environment of uncertainty for investors and businesses. The Regulatory Landscape in Detail The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) maintains a position against comprehensive crypto legislation, citing concerns that formal regulation would grant cryptocurrencies "legitimacy" and potentially elevate the sector to a systemic risk. The RBI also fears that widespread stablecoin adoption could fragment the nation's robust Unified Payment Interface (UPI) system. Despite these concerns, a government document acknowledges that the current $4.5 billion invested in cryptocurrencies by Indians does not pose a systemic risk to financial stability due to limited regulatory clarity. However, this lack of clear regulation has led to what industry leaders describe as an "ownership crisis" within the bureaucracy, hindering the development of a cohesive regulatory framework. Adding to the pressure, the Supreme Court of India has expressed strong dissatisfaction with the federal government's delay in establishing a regulatory framework, warning that this legislative vacuum has enabled widespread abuse and financial misconduct. The court previously called for a definitive policy direction on digital currencies, emphasizing the urgent need for regulation given the growing importance of digital assets in global finance. Investor Sentiment and Taxation A recent survey by Mudrex, a prominent Indian crypto investment platform, involving over 9,000 participants, reveals significant public demand for regulatory clarity. The survey found that 93% of respondents support crypto regulation, with 56% advocating for a full framework including investor protection. However, 84% of participants believe the current 30% tax on crypto gains is unfair compared to other asset classes, with 66% identifying it as the biggest deterrent to investment. Other significant concerns include the inability to offset losses and issues related to 1% TDS (Tax Deducted at Source). Nearly 90% of investors indicated they would increase their investments if government policies became clearer, highlighting the direct link between policy and capital flow. Market Implications and Talent Flight The prolonged regulatory paralysis carries substantial economic implications. Estimates suggest India could realize annual savings of $68 billion by integrating stablecoins into international payment flows, an opportunity currently unmet due to policy inaction. The lack of regulatory certainty has also accelerated a "brain drain," with an estimated 80-85% of India's top crypto talent relocating internationally. This exodus, coupled with a cautious market sentiment, deters foreign investment and innovation within India's crypto sector. Experts emphasize that clear regulation and tax clarity are crucial to prevent further capital flight and to cement India's position as a leading fintech hub. Global Context and Future Outlook Globally, other major economies are actively developing comprehensive regulatory frameworks for digital assets. The United States has enacted the GENIUS Act, which provides a framework for "payment stablecoins," mandating 1:1 backing and prohibiting interest payments on holdings. Similarly, the European Union's MiCA regulation has progressively rolled out, with stablecoin provisions already in effect. These international advancements underscore India's increasingly isolated regulatory stance. Projections from institutions such as J.P. Morgan Global Research anticipate the global stablecoin market reaching $500-$750 billion, with ambitious forecasts suggesting issuance could hit $10 trillion by 2028. Despite India leading the Chainalysis global crypto adoption index for three consecutive years, its internal regulatory challenges impede its ability to fully capitalize on this burgeoning global digital finance landscape.

Sep 10 2025, 06:33

Whale Shifts $4.2M from PEPE & PENDLE to ENA & AAVE

A crypto whale strategically rotated $4.2 million from PEPE and PENDLE into ENA and AAVE, signaling a potential shift in market sentiment. Executive Summary A notable crypto whale (address 0x3737) executed a strategic portfolio rotation, divesting from PEPE and PENDLE to acquire ENA and AAVE. The transactions, closely monitored by blockchain analytics firm Lookonchain, involved selling 388.72 billion PEPE tokens (worth $3.84 million) and 75,413 PENDLE tokens ($355,000), then purchasing 4,831 AAVE tokens ($1.58 million) and 3.09 million ENA tokens ($2.25 million). This move suggests a potential shift in market sentiment away from meme coins and yield-focused assets towards established DeFi protocols and emerging layer-2 solutions. The Event in Detail Over a 16-hour period, the whale, identified as 0x3737, executed the following trades: Sold 388.72 billion PEPE tokens at an average price of approximately $0.00000988, totaling $3.84 million. Sold 75,413 PENDLE tokens at an average price of $4.71, amounting to $355,000. Purchased 4,831 AAVE tokens at an average price of $327.2, costing $1.58 million. Purchased 3.09 million ENA tokens at an average price of $0.728, totaling $2.25 million. The total sales amounted to approximately $4.20 million, while purchases totaled $3.83 million, leaving roughly $0.37 million in unallocated capital. PEPE constituted approximately 91.5% of the sales, and ENA represented about 58.7% of the buys. Market Implications The whale's decision to reduce exposure to PEPE, known for its high volatility, and PENDLE, facing increasing competition in the DeFi space, suggests a risk-off approach. The pivot towards AAVE, a leading lending protocol, and ENA, associated with Ethena's synthetic dollar ecosystem, indicates a preference for assets with stronger fundamentals. The large-scale sell-off of PEPE could lead to increased volatility and potential downside pressure if other whales follow suit. Increased trading volume in ENA has been observed, spiking over 20% in the last 24 hours, indicating potential for short-term gains. Expert Commentary > "This move highlights a potential shift in market sentiment, where traders are pivoting from meme coins and yield-focused assets to more established DeFi protocols and emerging layer-2 solutions," according to Lookonchain. Crypto analyst Altcoin Sherpa noted that ENA shows strong momentum and that while profit-taking may be considered near current levels, the mid-term trend remains positive. Finish stated, “Everything under $1.1 is cheap, it's time we set a new ATH.” Broader Context Ethena (ENA) has shown significant growth, with one whale staking 9 million ENA tokens worth $9.77 million. In total, the trader has staked 15.65 million ENA tokens, currently worth $16.94 million on Ethena. ENA is currently priced at $0.84, with a 24-hour trading volume of $1.44 billion, and daily gains stand at 9%. Binance recently listed USDe, with total value locked (TVL) surpassing $13 billion, boosting sentiment around the Ethena ecosystem. Analysts project potential upside targets for ENA at $1.25, $2.60, $4.00, and $5.00+.

Pepe (PEPE) Price

PEPE Crypto Price Chart

Related News