The war in Iran, now in its sixth week, is forcing a global political realignment as every major power adjusts its strategy to a conflict with profound consequences for energy markets and international security.
Back
The war in Iran, now in its sixth week, is forcing a global political realignment as every major power adjusts its strategy to a conflict with profound consequences for energy markets and international security.

The six-week-old conflict between the US and Iran has sent Brent crude prices soaring above $110 a barrel, a nearly 60 percent jump, as the closure of the Strait of Hormuz forces a dramatic reshaping of global energy flows and political alliances.
"The security of the Gulf matters to everyone," Walter Russell Mead, a fellow at the Hudson Institute, wrote in the Wall Street Journal. "If at the end of the war Iran retains the ability to close the Strait of Hormuz, every country on earth will need Tehran’s blessing to access vital fuel and supplies."
The conflict, which began after US and Israeli strikes on February 28, has choked off the roughly 20 million barrels of oil per day that transit the Strait, representing 20 percent of global consumption. Brent crude futures climbed more than one percent to over $110 a barrel Sunday, up from around $70 before the crisis. In the US, average gasoline prices rose to $4.11 a gallon, up 13 cents from a week ago, according to AAA data.
The crisis now hinges on a Tuesday deadline set by President Trump, who has threatened to bomb Iranian power plants if the Strait is not reopened. While the White House says it is in "deep negotiations," the outcome will determine whether the global economy faces a sustained oil price shock that could spur inflation, or a return to stability if a decisive US victory reopens the critical waterway.
Every major power is adjusting its foreign-policy strategy in light of a conflict that is reshaping world politics. For China, the war creates a mixed impact. While its economy is hurt by higher fuel prices, Beijing has used the distraction to quietly resume building new islands in the South China Sea. It has also taken advantage of its relationship with Pakistan to enhance its diplomatic influence in the Middle East, a move that intensifies its competition with India.
Japan, while distant from the conflict, finds its access to Gulf resources under threat, forcing it to double down on rearmament and its security relationship with an unpredictable Washington. For India, the shock has been profound, facing not only an economic setback from high energy prices but also the renewed diplomatic clout of its rival, Pakistan, which has positioned itself as a key mediator.
Europe, meanwhile, has been largely sidelined, highlighting its declining significance in world affairs. European Union countries were not consulted on the war, have little influence over its course, and are divided in their response.
Analysts see three primary paths for how the conflict could end, each with vastly different implications for energy markets.
The first scenario involves a military escalation, where President Trump could seize Iran’s Kharg Island, through which about 90 percent of the country’s oil exports are handled. This would deal a massive blow to Tehran but would also exacerbate the global supply shock, likely driving oil prices even higher and benefiting producers outside the Middle East like Brazil, Guyana, and Kazakhstan.
A second possibility involves the US declaring victory and leaving the rest of the world to deal with the Strait. While the US has become a major energy producer, such a move could be politically disastrous, emboldening Iran and its partners, Russia and China. It would likely lead to the collapse of international law governing freedom of navigation and keep a permanent risk premium on oil prices.
The final scenario is a conditional armistice. Several countries, including Pakistan and China, have stepped up to broker negotiations. A deal that reopens the Strait would resolve immediate supply concerns, likely causing prices to recede from their peaks, though they would probably remain above pre-war levels. In this outcome, the US might claim victory by having degraded Iran's military and nuclear capabilities, but Iran's regime would remain a source of regional instability.
As the world watches the Tuesday deadline, the conflict serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of global energy security. A 2007 Congressional testimony warned of Iran's intent to close the Strait, a forecast that has now become a reality. How this war ends will determine the flow of capital and energy for decades.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.