A new US tariff regime threatening to cut entire countries off from the American market has pushed Iran to prepare for military retaliation, setting the stage for a major conflict.
Back
A new US tariff regime threatening to cut entire countries off from the American market has pushed Iran to prepare for military retaliation, setting the stage for a major conflict.

Iran announced on April 23rd it has formulated a target list for potential military action against the United States and its allies, a move that immediately pushed Brent crude futures toward $100 a barrel. Citing principles of “reciprocal response” and “offensive deterrence” amid diplomatic setbacks, the announcement represents a significant escalation in response to Washington’s “Operation Economic Fury” and its unprecedented 25% secondary tariff.
“This is a decisive test of the emerging multipolar world order,” said Saxon Zvina, principal consultant at Skyworld Consultancy Services. “As Washington doubles down on maximum pressure, the response from China, Russia, and the Global South will determine whether the dollar remains the world’s primary geopolitical weapon, or becomes the catalyst for its own decline.”
The new US framework, signed into law on February 6, 2026, establishes a 25% ad valorem tariff on imports from any nation that “directly or indirectly” acquires goods or services from Iran. The policy is a dramatic escalation from traditional sanctions, threatening to sever entire countries from the world's largest consumer market and forcing a binary choice: trade with Iran or trade with the US. The dollar index rose 0.5% on the news as investors fled to safety, while global equity futures turned sharply lower.
At stake is the future of the dollar-centric global financial system. Washington’s move is seen as a high-stakes gamble to reassert its economic dominance. However, if major powers like China, Russia, and India decide to sustain trade with Iran through alternative payment systems, it could mark the beginning of the end for America’s ability to unilaterally weaponize its currency.
Washington’s neoconservative wing may be overestimating its leverage. The comprehensive financial warfare waged against Russia following its invasion of Ukraine provides a clear precedent for Iran. Despite being cut off from the SWIFT messaging system and having its foreign reserves frozen, Russia successfully stabilized its economy, rerouted energy exports, and accelerated the development of alternative payment infrastructures like its System for Transfer of Financial Messages (SPFS) and China's Cross-Border Interbank Payment System (CIPS). This resilience set a powerful example that economic isolation by the West is no longer a guaranteed path to collapse. The last time the US attempted such broad secondary sanctions, against entities trading with Russia in 2022, it accelerated de-dollarization efforts among BRICS nations.
The US tariff regime forces nations across Asia, Africa, and Latin America into a difficult position. For major exporters, particularly African nations benefiting from the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), the threat of a 25% tariff presents a severe economic risk. South Africa’s recent decision to limit Iran to observer status in BRICS naval drills to protect its AGOA benefits shows this pressure is already working.
However, India remains the key swing power. A full commitment from New Delhi to use and promote BRICS-led payment architecture for its substantial energy trade with Iran would provide the critical mass needed to create a viable alternative to the dollar system. For now, India continues to hedge, balancing its strategic ties with Washington and its membership in the multipolar bloc. The success or failure of "Operation Economic Fury" may ultimately rest on which way India decides to lean. In the meantime, African nations are being encouraged to accelerate integration with platforms like the Pan-African Payment and Settlement System (PAPSS) to build resilience against such external pressures.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.