Google is facing a new £3 billion ($4 billion) lawsuit in the United Kingdom, where a collective action claim alleges the tech giant has abused its dominant position in the online display advertising market since 2015.
"Advertisers have many choices, and they choose our ad tech tools because they're simple, effective and affordable," a Google spokesperson said, calling the allegations "meritless."
The lawsuit, filed by law firm KP Law, argues that Google’s anti-competitive practices resulted in UK advertisers paying inflated prices for less effective advertising. The action automatically includes all UK advertisers who paid for Google's services since October 1, 2015, unless they opt out. This adds to a similar £13.6 billion claim from online publishers that was cleared to proceed to trial in 2024.
The case represents another significant legal and financial threat to Google's advertising business, which is already under intense regulatory pressure globally. The US government is actively trying to break up the business, while the European Union has already issued a €2.95 billion fine for similar anti-competitive behavior, a decision Google is appealing.
The claim argues that Google favored its own display advertising services, such as banner ads shown on websites, while excluding its rivals. KP Law said Google's practices left "advertisers paying more for less effective display advertising."
This legal challenge is structured as a collective action, meaning all potentially affected clients are automatically included unless they choose to opt out. It adds to a growing list of antitrust challenges confronting the US tech giant. A separate £13.6 billion lawsuit brought on behalf of online content publishers was cleared in 2024 to proceed to trial in the UK.
The company's advertising practices have been the subject of multiple investigations and legal proceedings in the UK, the European Union, and the United States, reflecting a broad-based regulatory pushback against its market power.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.