A long-time developer's proposal to fork Bitcoin and re-appropriate Satoshi Nakamoto's coins is drawing condemnation from the crypto community, who call the plan an outright theft.
Back
Back
Bitcoin Hard Fork Plan Sparks Outrage Over 1.1 Million Satoshi Coins
Long-time Bitcoin developer Paul Sztorc has proposed a contentious hard fork for 2026 called eCash that would reassign over 1.1 million coins linked to creator Satoshi Nakamoto, triggering a fierce debate about the network's core principles.
"Taking Satoshi coins is theft and disrespectful," Bitcoin advocate Peter McCormack said on X, echoing broad community sentiment against the proposal.
The plan, scheduled for Bitcoin block height 964,000 in August 2026, would create a new chain, eCash, giving existing BTC holders a 1:1 token distribution while adding the Drivechains scaling architecture. However, fewer than half of the Satoshi-equivalent coins would be pre-allocated to early investors to fund development.
The proposal challenges Bitcoin's foundational promise of immutable, censorship-resistant ownership, with critics warning that establishing a precedent for reassigning coins—even dormant ones—could undermine the entire value proposition of the $1.3 trillion network.
What is the eCash Hard Fork?
A hard fork occurs when a blockchain splits into two separate networks with a shared history but different rules moving forward, similar to a railway line diverging onto two different tracks. This is what created Bitcoin Cash (BCH) in 2017 amid disputes over block size. Sztorc's proposal would create eCash, distributing the new token to all existing Bitcoin holders at a 1:1 ratio.
The new chain's critical addition is Drivechains, a scaling architecture Sztorc first proposed in 2015. Drivechains act like service roads to Bitcoin's main highway, allowing new features and capabilities to be built on sidechains without altering Bitcoin's base layer. This could enable functionalities like privacy features modeled on Zcash or decentralized exchanges without requiring network-wide consensus.
A Dangerous Precedent or Necessary Incentive?
The primary controversy stems from Sztorc's plan to fund the project by reassigning a portion of the 1.1 million eCash tokens that would correspond to Satoshi Nakamoto's long-dormant Bitcoin wallets. Sztorc argues this is a necessary incentive to attract investors and developers, preventing the project from becoming a "zombie project" or overly centralized.
The response from the crypto community has been overwhelmingly negative. Josh Ellithorpe, CTO at Pixelated Ink, warned of the risk, stating, "eCash, setting the precedent that they can and will steal coins. Now it's Satoshi, but it could be anyone later." This sentiment reflects a deep-seated principle within the Bitcoin community that no coins, regardless of who owns them or how long they've been inactive, should be seized or reallocated at the protocol level. The debate touches on similar discussions around dormant coins, where the community has consistently favored inaction over any solution that could compromise Bitcoin's core promise of inviolable property rights.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.
[1] Paul Sztorc proposes a 2026 hard fork of Bitcoin called eCash, giving BTC holders equivalent tokens and adding Drivechains.[2] Adam Back Challenges the Biggest Claim About Satoshi’s Bitcoin Holdings[3] Freezing 5.6 million dormant bitcoin could trigger ‘worst’ single-day repricing[4] Developers plan to fork Bitcoin eCash, reallocation of Satoshi's tokens sparks controversy - WEEX
Features
Resources
© 2026 Finture Development Limited. All rights reserved