A Paris appeals court is set to rule on corporate manslaughter charges against Airbus and Air France, 17 years after the crash of Flight AF447 killed 228 people.
A Paris appeals court is set to rule on corporate manslaughter charges against Airbus and Air France, 17 years after the crash of Flight AF447 killed 228 people.

A Paris appeals court will issue a verdict on Thursday in a corporate manslaughter case against Airbus and Air France, culminating a 17-year legal battle over France's worst air disaster which claimed 228 lives in 2009. The decision follows an eight-week trial where prosecutors sought the maximum possible fine.
"We will seek to overturn the judgment and secure the conviction of both companies," prosecutor Agnes Labreuil said in November, lambasting the companies' behavior over the past 16 years as an "indecency."
The case centers on Air France Flight AF447, an Airbus A330 that vanished from radar on June 1, 2009, during a storm over the Atlantic Ocean while en route from Rio de Janeiro to Paris. Crash investigators, aided by the recovery of the plane's black boxes two years later, found that the crew mishandled a loss of airspeed data from iced-up pitot tubes, ultimately causing the aircraft to stall and plunge into the sea.
At stake is a potential fine of €225,000 ($261,720) for each company, a symbolic amount for the two aerospace giants. However, a conviction would represent a significant victory for the victims' families and a substantial reputational blow to both Airbus and Air France. A lower court had previously cleared both companies in 2023, finding them negligent but ruling there was no direct causal link to the crash.
The prosecution's case in the appeals trial focused on alleged failures within both the planemaker and the airline that occurred before the flight took off. Prosecutors accused Airbus of underestimating the seriousness of failures related to the pitot probes, which measure flight speed, and for failing to adequately inform airlines, preventing pilots from reacting correctly.
Air France was accused of providing insufficient training for pilots on how to handle a high-altitude emergency caused by the icing of these specific probes. Lawyers for the victims' families have argued for years that both companies were aware of the pitot tube problem prior to the crash.
Throughout the proceedings, both Airbus and Air France have consistently denied any criminal liability, attributing the crash primarily to pilot error. In the 2023 lower court ruling, judges acknowledged that both companies had committed "imprudence" and "negligence" but that it was not enough to prove a definitive causal link to the disaster, leading to the acquittal that prosecutors are now seeking to overturn.
The path to Thursday's verdict has been a legal marathon for the families of the victims, who are mainly of French, Brazilian, and German nationality. The initial acquittal was met with outrage from family groups who have fought for what they see as corporate accountability.
This appeal involved a completely new trial, with all evidence reviewed from scratch by the Paris Court of Appeal. Regardless of Thursday's outcome, legal experts anticipate that the losing party will likely launch a further appeal to the Cour de Cassation, France's highest court.
Such a move would shift the focus from the factual evidence of the AF447 crash to complex points of law, potentially extending the legal process for several more years and prolonging the ordeal for the relatives of the 228 passengers and crew who perished.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.