Edgen Crypto·Nov 22 2025, 19:04
[1] Altcoin News: Coinbase to Launch Round-the-Clock Futures for ... (https://www.livebitcoinnews.com/altcoin-news- ...)[2] Coinbase Derivatives Expands 24/7 Futures to New Altcoins - Phemex (https://phemex.com/news/article/coinbase-deri ...)[3] 24/7 trading goes live for all altcoin monthly futures from Coinbase ... (https://x.com/CoinbaseMarkets/status/19919425 ...)
Related News
Nov 23 2025, 00:33
Large-Scale Ethereum Transfer from Institutional Platform FalconX Spurs Speculation
## Executive Summary On-chain data reveals a significant transfer of 21,537 **Ethereum** (ETH), worth approximately $60.04 million, from the institutional-focused prime brokerage **FalconX** to a newly created wallet. The transaction has drawn attention due to its size and the institutional nature of the source. The identity of the recipient is currently unknown, though market analysts have speculated potential connections to entities such as **Bitmine** or **SharpLink**. This event occurs amid a backdrop of broader institutional withdrawals from the platform and highlights the ongoing trend of large, often opaque, movements of digital assets by major players. ## The Event in Detail According to on-chain monitoring service **OnchainLens**, a new wallet address received the 21,537 ETH in a single transaction. This specific event is part of a larger pattern of outflows from **FalconX**, with data indicating that one address has withdrawn a total of 40,335 ETH (worth over $121 million) in the last three days. **FalconX** operates as a prime brokerage for institutional investors, offering services such as deep liquidity, financing, and trade execution. Such platforms are critical infrastructure for large firms entering the digital asset market. The movement of substantial assets from a prime brokerage can signify several strategic actions, including a large over-the-counter (OTC) trade, a shift in custody strategy, or preparation for future asset deployment or liquidation. ## Market Implications The transfer of a significant amount of ETH to a new, anonymous wallet introduces uncertainty into the market. Such movements can be a precursor to selling pressure if the holder decides to liquidate the position on open exchanges. Conversely, it could represent a long-term holding strategy, effectively removing the supply from the active market. The ambiguity surrounding the wallet holder's intent contributes to potential price volatility for **ETH**. This event is particularly relevant as **Ethereum** trades around key psychological price levels. The $3,000 mark is often seen by investors as a critical benchmark for market sentiment and progress on institutional adoption and regulatory clarity. ## Expert Commentary The psychological importance of key price levels was highlighted by Jim Hwang, COO of crypto investment firm Firinne Capital, in a recent report. While not commenting on this specific transaction, he noted the significance of round numbers for investor heuristics. > "Investors remember these to base their heuristics around what their cost basis is, gains they want to lock in, or losses they don’t want to go below. The $3,000 level for ETH is a bit of a report card by investors assessing the progress that the industry has made on the legislative, regulatory, and institutional adoption fronts." ## Broader Context This transaction underscores the increasing role of institutional players in the cryptocurrency landscape. **FalconX** facilitates this trend, evidenced by its recent partnership with **Ethena** to expand institutional access to the **USDe** stablecoin. The strategic management of large crypto treasuries is becoming more common, as seen in the case of **FG Nexus**, which recently sold ETH to finance a share buyback program. This latest transfer from **FalconX**, however, remains undefined, leaving the market to speculate whether it represents a similar strategic treasury maneuver, a large-scale investment, or preparation for another purpose. The event serves as a reminder of the complex and often non-transparent nature of institutional capital flows within the digital asset economy.
Nov 23 2025, 00:31
Port3 Network Exploited: Attacker Mints 1B Tokens, Crashes Price, Then Destroys Supply
## Executive Summary The **Port3 Network** has suffered a significant security exploit, resulting in the unauthorized minting of 1 billion **$PORT3** tokens. The attacker subsequently executed a large-scale dump of the tokens on the open market, leading to a severe price depreciation. In a final, unusual step, the perpetrator destroyed the remaining illicitly created tokens. This event underscores persistent security risks within the DeFi sector, particularly concerning smart contract vulnerabilities that permit supply manipulation. ## The Event in Detail The attack unfolded in a clear sequence. First, an unidentified entity exploited a flaw in the **Port3 Network's** protocol, gaining the ability to create new tokens. This vulnerability was leveraged to mint 1 billion **$PORT3** tokens, an action that massively inflated the token's circulating supply. Immediately following the minting event, the attacker began liquidating the illicitly acquired assets on various cryptocurrency exchanges. The sudden and massive increase in sell pressure triggered a rapid price collapse. The final phase of the attack involved the attacker sending the remaining un-dumped tokens to a burn address, effectively destroying them and permanently removing them from the supply. ## Financial Mechanics of the Exploit Unlike exploits that drain liquidity pools or steal existing assets, this attack centered on manipulating the token supply itself. By minting new tokens, the attacker created value out of thin air, which was then realized by selling into the existing market. This method directly devalues the holdings of all legitimate token owners through hyperinflation. The destruction of the remaining tokens is an atypical action. While the motive is not confirmed, it could be interpreted as an attempt to erase trails or simply as a final, definitive action to conclude the exploit, ensuring the remaining illicit tokens could not be frozen or recovered. ## Market Implications and Precedent The immediate market reaction was a loss of confidence and a significant drop in the valuation of **$PORT3**. This incident draws parallels to previous exploits in the DeFi space, such as the **Yala** hack. In that event, an attacker also illegally minted tokens by exploiting a cross-chain bridge, converting them into other assets like **$ETH**. However, the **Port3** exploit differs from incidents like the **Poly Network** hack, where the attacker eventually returned the funds, claiming to be a "white-hat" hacker exposing vulnerabilities. The actions of the **Port3** attacker—dumping tokens for profit—indicate clear malicious intent. Such events damage investor confidence not only in the specific project but also in the broader ecosystem, reinforcing the need for rigorous code audits and security measures. ## Broader Context: Smart Contract and Bridge Security This event again places a spotlight on the critical importance of robust smart contract security. The ability to mint new tokens should be one of the most protected functions of a token contract. Furthermore, a number of recent high-profile exploits, including those affecting **Harmony's Horizon Bridge**, have involved vulnerabilities in cross-chain bridge technology. These bridges, while essential for interoperability between blockchains, create additional attack surfaces. This incident serves as a stark reminder that as the DeFi landscape matures, attackers are increasingly targeting fundamental protocol logic and cross-chain infrastructure, necessitating a more sophisticated and layered approach to security from development teams.
Nov 22 2025, 17:34
Report: $12B in DeFi Liquidity Sits Idle, Highlighting Widespread Inefficiency
## Executive Summary A new report on the state of Decentralized Finance (DeFi) has exposed critical inefficiencies within its core infrastructure, revealing that as much as $12 billion in digital assets lies dormant in liquidity pools. The analysis indicates that between 83% and 95% of all capital supplied to automated market makers (AMMs) is not being actively used for trading. This widespread capital inefficiency is disproportionately impacting retail participants, with data showing that approximately half of all liquidity providers (LPs) are incurring financial losses. ## The Event in Detail The central issue identified is the phenomenon of **impermanent loss**, a risk inherent to providing liquidity in AMMs where the price of deposited assets changes compared to their value if simply held. According to the findings, these potential losses are not being sufficiently compensated by the trading fees earned. The study highlights that roughly 50% of LPs on major platforms like **Uniswap V3** have suffered negative returns, contributing to a collective deficit exceeding $60 million. This problem is exacerbated by what experts describe as fragmented liquidity. Capital is spread thinly across thousands of isolated pools, many of which fail to attract significant trading volume. An OECD report on the matter confirms this high concentration, noting that the vast majority of trading volume occurs in a "tiny fraction" of available liquidity pools, predominantly on the **Ethereum** blockchain. ## Market Implications The report's findings present a significant challenge to the DeFi ecosystem's long-term viability and its appeal to mainstream investors. The high rate of loss among retail LPs could erode confidence and deter new capital from entering the space, thereby limiting growth. Furthermore, the data suggests that the current AMM model, while innovative, is structurally flawed, failing to provide sustainable returns for a large portion of its user base. This inefficiency represents a substantial opportunity cost and a drag on the overall health of the decentralized economy. ## Expert Commentary Financial analysts and protocol developers have pointed to these figures as evidence of an unsustainable model for retail participants. A study conducted by **Bancor**, a decentralized trading protocol, previously corroborated these findings, noting that 49.5% of LPs on Uniswap V3 experienced negative returns due to impermanent loss. In response, some industry experts are championing **concentrated liquidity** as a potential solution. This mechanism allows LPs to allocate their capital within specific price ranges where most trading occurs, rather than across an infinite spectrum. By concentrating liquidity, providers can theoretically improve capital efficiency and earn higher fees from the same amount of assets, offering a more active way to manage risk and potentially mitigate impermanent loss. ## Broader Context This liquidity crisis is symptomatic of a broader structural issue within DeFi: market fragmentation. Even on integrated blockchains, liquidity remains siloed in isolated pools, preventing capital from flowing to where it is most needed. The over-concentration of activity in a handful of protocols and pools indicates a market that is still maturing. As the DeFi sector evolves, addressing these fundamental inefficiencies will be critical for fostering a more stable, efficient, and trustworthy financial ecosystem capable of supporting sophisticated, high-volume trading.