Content
What the rest of the coverage is getting wrong
The 13-date calendar
The Money Person take

Markets Confusing? Ask Edgen Search.

Instant answers, zero BS, and trading decisions your future self will thank you for.

Try Search Now

SpaceX goes public Thursday with a possible $5 trillion hit. Here's the calendar that actually matters.

Edgen
· Jun 10 2026
SpaceX goes public Thursday with a possible $5 trillion hit. Here's the calendar that actually matters.

SpaceX prices Wednesday night and opens Thursday on Nasdaq at $135 per share — a $1.77 trillion valuation, the largest IPO ever. Most coverage will frame what comes next as a sentiment trade, an Elon story, or a race to Goldman's $5 trillion bull case. The reality is more grounded and more useful: the next 366 days are governed by an unusually clean calendar of supply releases — when 95.8% of the company can or cannot trade, when index funds add weight, when the lock-up cliff arrives, when Musk himself becomes a potential seller for the first time.

Read the calendar and you've already understood the structure most market commentary will spend the next quarter trying to explain. Here are the 13 dates worth watching.

What the rest of the coverage is getting wrong

Two things keep showing up in headlines that don't survive a careful read.

The first is the idea that index funds are about to be forced into a massive single-event SpaceX buy. They aren't. Nasdaq did create a fast-track inclusion rule that lets SpaceX join the Nasdaq 100 within 15 trading days of IPO — but the same rule caps the weighting at 3× float for low-float names, which for SpaceX (4.2% float) caps the effective weighting at roughly 12.6% of market cap. Real, but not the "$20B+ in 15 days" event some coverage has implied. Analyst estimates for net Nasdaq 100 inflow land in the $10–20B range over the inclusion ramp.

The second is the assumption that S&P 500 inclusion is coming soon. S&P Global refused to change its rules for the flagship index. SpaceX cannot enter the S&P 500 until at least mid-2027 and must show four quarters of positive GAAP earnings first. With Starship R&D running at $3 billion a year and operating losses still negative, the earliest realistic S&P 500 inclusion is 2027 — pushing the largest forced-passive-demand event past the 2026 lock-up cliff entirely. Counterintuitively, that delay creates a cleaner long-term setup, not a worse one.

Both points matter because what's actually driving the structural setup is not forced buyers. It is locked sellers — and the schedule of when those locks release is publicly disclosed.

The 13-date calendar

The 13 dates that govern the next 366 days — Ed Wealth Research calendar of SpaceX lock-up cliffs, index inclusion, and Mars launches.

The Money Person take

Three windows, three time horizons — Ed Wealth Research framework for SpaceX exposure: structurally up, post-cliff drawdown, fundamentals regime.

Three windows for three time horizons — with a $5 trillion possibility riding on top of all of them.

The first 180 days are structurally biased upward: 95.8% of stock is locked while $175 billion of unfilled demand chases 4.2% of float, with Mars launches adding a fundamental catalyst. Post-cliff drawdowns of 10–25% are then the historical norm. Musk himself stays locked until June 13, 2027 — after which the trade resets to fundamentals: Goldman's $322 billion AI revenue path, Starship economics, orbital data center commercialization. $5 trillion is roughly 2.8× from $135 to about $380. Some of that move is structurally front-loaded into Year 1; the rest depends on whether the fundamental engine fires across 2027–2030.

None of those windows is wrong — they're just different horizons. The wealth-builder's edge is understanding which one matches theirs. The calendar is what's scheduled. $5 trillion is what could happen if execution matches the math.


Ed Wealth Research provides institutional-quality analysis to retail investors. This is not investment advice. SpaceX is a private company until June 12, 2026. All lock-up dates, index inclusion timelines, and Mars mission schedules cited above are based on the SpaceX S-1 filing and public reporting through June 10, 2026; actual dates may shift. Past performance of comparable low-float IPOs does not indicate future results. Verify current ETF holdings via each issuer's fact sheet before purchasing.

Recommend
SpaceX prices its IPO June 11 at a $1.75–2T valuation. Most retail is asking "how do I buy SpaceX?" — here's the wider way to think about it, with three paths to be on the right side of the catalyst.

Investing in SpaceX Doesn't Mean Buying SpaceX

By Edgen Research | 2026-05-28 Everyone is talking about SpaceX right now. The S-1 went public on May 20. Pricing is set for June 11, trading begins June 12 under ticker SPCX, and the deal targets $80 billion raised at a $1.75–2 trillion valuation — the largest IPO in history by a wide margin. So the natural question coming up in every group chat, every brokerage app, every Reddit thread is: how do I buy SpaceX before it IPOs? Fair question. There's also a wider one underneath it that's worth a minute of your time. What most people are really after isn't a specific stock — it's being on the right side of what SpaceX is dragging up: reusable launch becoming the default, Starlink turning satellite connectivity into everyday infrastructure, space turning into the next platform layer for defense, telecom and industrial software. You can absolutely play that by buying SpaceX equity. You can also play it through stocks you can already buy today, sometimes with cleaner risk and without the IP
Edgen
·
May 27 2026
Five small fixes shipped this week to Ed by Edgen — refreshed web design with bell notifications, charts inside chat answers, simpler thinking process, voice input, and a homepage that knows you.

Ed Got Smarter This Week (May 22 Update) — Here's How

By Edgen | 2026-05-26 Your money person should solve the small annoyances first. This week Ed knocked out five of them — desktop and mobile felt like two different products, data answers were lifeless, you couldn't tell what he was thinking, typing detailed questions on the go was a pain, and the homepage didn't really know you. All five just got better. Web just picked up the same brand color, clean cards, and bell-notification setup the mobile app already had. Whether you open Ed on your phone in the morning or your laptop at lunch, it's one consistent product — and alerts find you on both. Ask Ed about a stock price, a market-cap split, or a year-over-year trend — the answer now comes back with a clean chart inside the reply. Same data, much easier to read at a glance, no need to imagine the picture from a wall of numbers. Ed is a proactive AI — what he's doing for you matters as much as the final answer. The thinking process is now one clean line you can follow: "Reading Goldman Sa
Edgen
·
May 26 2026
Aschenbrenner's Q1 13F: $5.52B in AI infrastructure longs (BE, SNDK, CRWV) + $1.6B NVDA puts. The puts are most likely a hedge — not a short.

Leopold Aschenbrenner's Real AI Bets: Bloom Energy, SanDisk, CoreWeave — the NVDA Put Is Probably a Hedge

What are the world's most-watched investors actually buying right now? The Q1 2026 13F filings — released May 15 — give the clearest answer in years: every major filer is building AI exposure. The disagreement is over how. The most-headlined case is Leopold Aschenbrenner — the ex-OpenAI researcher who wrote the Situational Awareness essay and now runs Situational Awareness LP ($9.28B regulatory AUM per the March 2026 SEC Form ADV; $5.52B of that is the disclosed U.S. equity book). The press ran with "Aschenbrenner bet $8.46 billion against AI chips." That headline is technically true and practically misleading. What he actually did with real capital: load up on the AI infrastructure that makes the boom possible — power, memory, data-center capacity. The $8.46B against NVDA and other chipmakers is almost certainly a hedge on those AI longs, not a directional bet against AI itself. If you're trying to build AI exposure for the long run, his buy list — and what 4 other big names are doing
Edgen
·
May 21 2026
Nomura raised SK Hynix's price target from ₩840K to ₩4M in 6 months — 5x. Goldman lifted MU's 2026 EPS estimate 133%. Why MU and SNDK move from Hold to Buy.

Nomura Quintupled SK Hynix's Target in 6 Months — A Tailwind for MU and SNDK

On May 17, Nomura raised SK Hynix's price target to ₩4 million won — roughly five times the level it set just six months ago. The size of that revision matters less than what Nomura wrote underneath it: AI memory demand is entering a "new regime" that breaks the historical cycle model. We're updating our #66 AI hardware basket map on the back of it — MU and SNDK move from Hold to Buy. The trajectory is the story, not the endpoint. Four sequential raises. Each one looked aggressive when published. Each one was conservative within weeks. The current PT implies +119.9% upside from the May 15 close of ₩1.82M — Nomura's bull case explicitly recalibrating to a "new regime," not extrapolating from the prior cycle. I'd argue the May 17 raise matters more than the four that came before it. The earlier raises tracked rising EPS estimates inside the same cyclical model. This one reframes the model itself — what Nomura calls "memory stock re-rating driven by exponential demand growth from AI." Nom
Edgen
·
May 18 2026
NVDA isn't the whole AI hardware trade. SanDisk +3,362%, Micron +340% past year prove it. Which AI hardware sectors still have upside — and which don't?

NVDA Is One Basket of AI Hardware. Here Are the Other Four, Ranked.

SanDisk is up 3,362% over the past 12 months (Yahoo Finance). Micron is up around 340% in the same window (Yahoo Finance). Both are AI hardware. Neither is NVIDIA. If you call yourself "long AI" but own only NVDA, you're not long AI — you're long one basket, and the other four ran without you. SNDK and MU are the proof of how expensive that miss can be. Here's the map. Five baskets. Where I'd put new money today (Basket 4) and where I wouldn't (Basket 1). Bottom line first. If you can only add to one basket today, I'd add to Basket 4 — Optical Interconnect. Not NVDA. Not HBM. Not foundry. One sentence: AI's bottleneck is shifting from "memory can't feed the GPU fast enough" (the 2024 problem) to "the wires can't connect 100,000 GPUs at once" (the 2026-2028 problem). The market hasn't fully priced this yet. AI-themed funds barely own any of the optical names.
Edgen
·
May 15 2026
earnings-beats-fail-2026-edgen-3-signal-framework_header.png

Why Earnings Beats Fail in 2026: Edgen's 3-Signal Framework

Something broke in Q1 2026 earnings that contradicts what most retail investors learned in 2023-2024. Affirm reported adjusted EPS of $0.37 against a $0.27 consensus — nearly 40% above the Street — and the stock fell 5%. Coinbase missed revenue by 31% — a catastrophic shortfall by any historical standard — and the stock declined only 2.5%. SoFi beat the quarter and raised full-year guidance, then dropped 15%. Palantir reported 85% year-over-year revenue growth — and went sideways. These are the four prints Edgen Research covered in real time during April and May 2026. Across them, the relationship between an earnings beat and stock direction has visibly decoupled. This is not a noisy small sample — it is a structural change in how the market processes quarterly information. Three signals appeared in every single beat-and-fade case we tracked, and they also predict — in reverse — the rare cases that beat and rally, such as NXP's +18% reaction to its Q1 print. This article is the framewo
Edgen
·
May 14 2026

Your money person, finally.

Try Ed free. No credit card. No commitment.